First 90 days

Build a technology risk picture before you inherit a surprise.

A practical review for a manufacturing CFO who needs to understand what could interrupt production, distort numbers, or create an unplanned investment.

Start with business dependency. You do not need an inventory of every device. You need a defensible view of the systems, people, vendors, and sites that would interrupt orders, production, shipping, payroll, cash collection, or month-end close.

Questions finance leaders raiseCan I trust the number before close? Are the workarounds known? If the provider changes, who owns the knowledge? What happens if the ERP or identity system is unavailable on a production day?

Days 1–30: establish the facts

  • Name the business systems that stop revenue, production, fulfillment, or close.
  • Identify the executive, business owner, and technical owner for each critical system.
  • Request the current IT budget, provider agreement, project list, asset lifecycle plan, and cyber-insurance questionnaire.
  • Ask where critical knowledge lives: internal staff, a provider, a consultant, or an undocumented workaround.

Days 31–60: test the evidence

  • For each critical system, ask for the last recovery test, its result, its owner, and its actual time to restore.
  • Review current vendor access, privileged accounts, and what happens when a person leaves.
  • Compare planned technology spend with open renewal, replacement, and implementation commitments.
  • Confirm the status of ERP integrations, manual imports, data ownership, and reconciliations.

Days 61–90: turn findings into decisions

DecisionEvidence to requestUseful output
Fund recoveryRestore-test record, RTO/RPO, system ownerPrioritized recovery plan
Change providerService history, access inventory, transition planRisk-managed transition decision
Approve ERP workDependencies, data-quality baseline, cutover planGo, pause, or phase decision
Set the budgetRun-rate, renewals, lifecycle, project estimates12-month investment roadmap

The goal is not a technical audit. It is a short decision file that makes ownership, evidence, timing, and financial exposure visible.